header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws—Bankruptcy—Order of foreign bankruptcy court

Rubin and another v Eurofinance SA and others [2010] EWCA Civ 895, [2010] All ER (D) 358 (Jul)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division,Ward, Wilson LJJ and Henderson J, 30 July 2010

Foreign bankruptcy proceedings, including adversary proceedings, should be recognised as a foreign main proceeding in accordance with the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency as set out in Sch 1 to the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006. The appointment therein of the receivers as foreign representatives within the meaning of art 2(j) of the Model Law should be similarly recognised.

Tom Smith (instructed by Dundas & Wilson LLP) for the receivers. Marcus Staff (instructed by Brown Rudnick LLP) for the defendants.

The proceedings concerned The Consumers Trust (TCT) created in March 2002 in order to carry on a sales promotion scheme in the USA and Canada. The trust profitably operated a voucher scheme until subjected to consumer protection proceedings. The first respondent settlor appointed the applicants, as the receivers and managers of TCT, to institute New York bankruptcy proceedings under Chapter 11 of the US bankruptcy code.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll