header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 January 2015
Issue: 7635 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Toyota Tsusho Sugar Trading Ltd v Prolat SRL [2014] EWHC 3649 (Comm), [2014] All ER (D) 105 (Nov)

The Commercial Court granted the claimant, Toyota Tsusho Sugar Trading Ltd, a declaration that an English arbitration tribunal had substantive jurisdiction over any dispute between Toyota and the defendant, arising out of or in connection with a contract for the sale of sugar by Toyota to the defendant.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
TheGazette LogoClick to know more
Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
Read All
Pro Bono Week marks silver jubilee
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
NLJ this week: Pro bono’s silver lining
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
NLJ this week: Wrong expert, costly exit
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
NLJ this week: Time for judges to break their silence?
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
NLJ this week: Discounted damages, different costs
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll