header-logo header-logo

Conflict of laws

05 October 2012
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Slutsker v Haron Investments Ltd and another [2012] EWHC 2539 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 96 (Sep)

It was an established principle that the rights of spouses, in respect of moveable property, should be regulated by the law of their domicile but it was equally clear that their rights in relation to heritable estate would be governed by the law of the place where it was situated. However, that principle had no application where the lex domicilii provided for a community property regime to apply in default of contrary agreement and where the parties had made no contrary agreement, and were thus to be treated as having positively chosen that regime.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll