header-logo header-logo

14 July 2011
Issue: 7474 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws

NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina [2011] UKSC 31, [2011] All ER (D) 44 (Jul)

Section 31 of the Civil Jurisdictions and Judgments Act 1982 was the means by which the UK’s legislator achieved, for the first time, a comprehensive and coherent treatment of the issue of state immunity in respect of foreign judgments. Adopting a narrow interpretation, the drafters of the State Immunity Act 1978 or Parliament had not contemplated that s 3(1)(a) of that Act had in mind that it would or should apply to a foreign judgment against a foreign state.

Section 31 of the 1982 Act provided comprehensively for the recognition and enforcement of the foreign judgments to which it applied. A foreign judgment against a state would be capable of enforcement in England if both of the following conditions were fulfilled: first, that the foreign court would have had jurisdiction if it had applied the UK rules on sovereign immunity set out in ss 2 to 11 of the 1978 Act, the effect of which was that a state was not immune (inter alia) where it submitted to the jurisdiction

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll