header-logo header-logo

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Conflict of laws

Angara Maritime Ltd v Oceanconnect UK Ltd and another [2010] EWCA Civ 1050, [2010] All ER (D) 110 (Oct)

Under English conflict of law rules, recognition of a right to enforce a maritime lien was a matter to be determined according to the law of the forum. There was no maritime lien of necessity under English law and the categories of maritime lien capable of recognition under English law could only be extended by statute. The mere fact that statute conferred a jurisdiction did not mean that under English law the claim in question assumed the nature of a maritime lien. Whilst in the English courts a supplier of bunkers to a vessel would be entitled to proceed by way of an action in rem, provided that the bunkers constituted necessaries, the supplier would not enjoy a maritime lien as a matter of English law
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll