Horada v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2015] EWHC 2512 (Admin), [2015] All ER (D) 370 (Jul)
The claimant challenged the defendant secretary of state’s decision to affirm a compulsory purchase order for a market. The Administrative Court, in dismissing the application, held that the secretary of state’s conclusion had been one that had been open to him on the basis of the material before him about the project taken as a whole.
"Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit...""There is no one who loves pain itself, who seeks after it and wants to have it, simply because it is pain..."
Gateley Legal expands Midlands residential development team
Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees
Family lawyers cite financial disincentives for issuing child protection orders
