header-logo header-logo

Compensating the consumer

23 October 2014 / David Greene
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial
printer mail-detail
speakerscorner_green

Post-Jackson could individuals wronged by Wonga secure access to the court at a reasonable cost, asks David Greene

As “class action” lawyers we are often approached by individuals on potential claims against corporations or public bodies. Someone asked me the other day about potential claims against Wonga following the FCA and company’s announcements of the writing off of a huge swathe of debt. I know not if a claim arises but if it does, how do the individuals secure access to the court at a reasonable cost?

A claim brought by a large group sharing the cost and liabilities might be seen as a reasonable way forward. Unfortunately, the post-Jackson world does not lend itself to such a collective approach leaving potential claimants without a reasonable remedy. The collective process we have is ad hoc and in a state of flux. For consumers with small absolute individual losses there is nowhere to turn unless a regulator intervenes as happened with the SWAPS mis-selling and to some extent in Wonga.

Finding a solution

We have no “class action” process; in that we do not allow

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll