header-logo header-logo

23 October 2008
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Comparative matters

How much scope do advertisers have to use comparative trademarks? Ask Hamish Porter & Louisa Albertini

Comparative advertising, where goods or services offered by a competitor are identified by reference to a registered trade mark, can cause great concern to trade mark owners as their competitors normally seek to make unfavourable comparisons with their own goods or services, or to take advantage of being associated with the market leader's brand. The UK courts have recently requested guidance from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the extent to which comparative advertising can be used.
Marking one's territory

The Trade Marks Directive (TMD), (First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988, to approximate the laws of the member states relating to trade marks), provides that a trade mark owner is entitled under certain conditions to prevent third parties from using a sign which is identical or similar to his trade mark, including use in advertising. In contrast, the Comparative Advertising Directive—Council Directive 84/450/ EEC of 10 September 1984 relating to the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states concerning misleading advertising (as amended by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll