header-logo header-logo

06 January 2011
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Company law

Lomas and others v JFB Firth Rixson Inc and other companies [2010] EWHC 3372 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 248 (Dec)

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) master agreement was one of the most widely used forms of standard market agreement used in the financial world. It was axiomatic that it should, as far as possible, be interpreted in a way that served the objectives of clarity, certainty and predictability, so that the very large number of parties using it should know where they stood.

Nonetheless, the master agreement did not ordinarily constitute the entirety of the parties’ bargain in relation to a particular transaction. Each transaction was regulated by specific terms in the schedule and the confirmation which prevailed over the master agreement in the event of any inconsistency.

The process of implication was not something separate and distinct from construction. It was part of the process which arose when the instrument did not expressly provide for what was to happen when some event occurred.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll