header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
08 March 2012
Issue: 7504 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company—Administration—Client funds

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Re Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration) [2012] UKSC 6, [2012] All ER (D) 193 (Feb)

Supreme Court, Lord Hope DP, Lord Walker, Lord Clarke, Lord Dyson, Lord Collins SCJJ, 29 Feb 2012

Client money is held on the statutory trust imposed by Chapter 7 of the Client Assets Sourcebook (CASS 7), issued by the Financial Services Authority (FSA), 7.7, from the time of receipt by a firm.

Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (LBIE) was incorporated in England as an unlimited company. It was the principal European trading company in the Lehman Brothers group and was authorised and regulated by the FSA. LBIE was not a licensed deposit-taker but it was authorised to hold clients’ money. LBIE was put into administration by an order of Henderson J made in September 2008. The administrators made several applications to the Companies Court for directions under para 63 of Sch B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986. One of those was a client money application. Nine representative claimants were joined as parties to argue the issues.

In December 2009, Briggs J made an order giving directions on a range

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll