header-logo header-logo

23 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company

Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (UK) v Her Majesty’s Attorney General and others [2017] EWHC 1379 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 67 (Jun)

The Chancery Division approved a grant of US$360m from the claimant charity, The Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (UK) (CIFF), which was founded by Sir Christopher Hohn and his ex-wife, Ms Cooper, to Big Win Philanthropy, a charity founded by Ms Cooper. The court held that members of a charity owed fiduciary duties to act in the best interests of that charity, including a charitable company limited by guarantee, and that the grant, which was approved following the couple’s divorce, would be in the best interests of CIFF. Among other things, it held that the proposed grant would constitute a payment as consideration for, or in connection with, Ms Cooper’s loss of office, within the proper meaning of s 215(1) of the Companies Act 2006, so as to require the approval of CIFF’s members, under s 217 of that Act. It ordered that, subject the consent of the Charity Commission and CIFF’s memorandum, the grant had to be approved by CIFF’s members.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll