header-logo header-logo

02 February 2012
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company

Re Virtualpurple Professional Services Limited [2011] EWHC 3487 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 149 (Jan)

Reading paras 26 and 28 of Sch B1 of the Insolvency Rules 1986 (SI 1986/1925) consistently with other provisions and with an eye on the purpose for which they had been enacted, directors could proceed to make an immediate appointment without giving “notice of intention” to the company. As a matter of strict construction there was a strong indication that the draftsman had contemplated two scenarios.

One in which notice of intention had to be given to a qualifying chargeholder and another in which no such notice had to be given. Paragraph 30 of Sch B1 dealt with the contents of the statutory declaration that had to be contained in the prescribed form “in a case in which no person is entitled to notice of intention to appoint under paragraph 26(1) and paragraph 28 therefore does not apply”. That indicated that para 28 was intended only to apply where there was someone who was entitled to appoint an administrative receiver of the company or there was a qualifying chargeholder.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll