header-logo header-logo

01 February 2013
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company

Eckerle and others v Wickeder Westfalenstahl GmbH and another [2013] EWHC 68 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 150 (Jan)

Section 98 of the Companies Act 2006 dealt with the situation where a special resolution by a public company to be re-registered as a private limited company had been passed. It allowed certain persons to apply to the court for the cancellation of the resolution. On its true construction, s 98 did not apply to the holders of economic interest in shares and did not enable the holder of the ultimate economic interest to exercise rights otherwise vested in a member to protect the economic value of the shares. Membership, not ownership of an economic interest, defined the class from whom interest might be acquired of dissentient members. It was settled law that registration conferred title. Without registration, an applicant was not the holder of a share or a member of the company: the share has not been issued to him. No person could be a shareholder until he was registered. A person who was not a shareholder by registration could not claim that the share had been issued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll