header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Company

Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Richards and another [2011] EWCA Civ 855, [2011] All ER (D) 197 (Jul)

There was no express provision in either the Arbitration Act 1996 or the Companies Act 2006 which excluded arbitration as a possible means of determining disputes regarding an allegation of unfair prejudice. The test under s 1(b) of the 1996 Act that parties should be free to agree how their disputes were resolved subject only to such safeguards as were necessary in the public interest was a demanding test. It was not necessary in the public interest that agreements to refer disputes about the internal management of a company should in general be prohibited, nor was there any reason why it was necessary to prohibit arbitration agreements to the extent that they, in particular, applied to disputes whether a company’s affairs were being or had been conducted in a manner that was unfairly prejudicial to the interests of its members. What the 1996 Act did was to give primacy to the arbitration agreement even in domestic disputes by making a stay of court proceedings relating to the same dispute

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll