header-logo header-logo

Company

28 July 2011
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Richards and another [2011] EWCA Civ 855, [2011] All ER (D) 197 (Jul)

There was no express provision in either the Arbitration Act 1996 or the Companies Act 2006 which excluded arbitration as a possible means of determining disputes regarding an allegation of unfair prejudice. The test under s 1(b) of the 1996 Act that parties should be free to agree how their disputes were resolved subject only to such safeguards as were necessary in the public interest was a demanding test. It was not necessary in the public interest that agreements to refer disputes about the internal management of a company should in general be prohibited, nor was there any reason why it was necessary to prohibit arbitration agreements to the extent that they, in particular, applied to disputes whether a company’s affairs were being or had been conducted in a manner that was unfairly prejudicial to the interests of its members. What the 1996 Act did was to give primacy to the arbitration agreement even in domestic disputes by making a stay of court proceedings relating to the same dispute

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

back-to-top-scroll