header-logo header-logo

14 April 2011
Issue: 7461 + 7462 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Company

Farstad Supply A/S v Enviroco Ltd [2011] UKSC 16, [2011] All ER (D) 55 (Apr)

The definition of “member” in s 22 of the Companies Act 1985 reflected a fundamental principle of UK company law, namely that, except where express provision was made to the contrary, the person on the register of the members was the member to the exclusion of any other person, unless and until the register was rectified.

The legislation made it clear that the member was the person on the register, and where it was necessary to apply the legislation to persons who were not on the register, special provision was made. 

Section 736A(6) of the 1985 Act provided that “rights held” by a person as nominee for another “shall be treated as held by the other”, and s 736A(7) provided in principle that rights attached to shares held by way of security “shall be treated as held by the person providing the security”.

The terms were substantially the same as paras 7 and 8 of Sch 10A to the 1985 Act, supplementing s 258 of the Companies Act 1989. Neither of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll