header-logo header-logo

Companies Act 2006 raises environmental threat

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Commercial
printer mail-detail

News

UK company directors could face law suits from all over the world for causing environmental damage following this week’s implementation of the Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006), lawyers warn.

Paul Lester, a partner specialising in corporate law at LG, warns that the legislation opens the door for directors to be sued in British courts for damage to the environment in any part of the world.

“This is genuinely groundbreaking in that it is no longer going to be enough for directors solely to focus on the bottom line when assessing their company’s performance—they will also have to consider what impact the company’s activities might have on others and be able to demonstrate that they have fulfilled their corporate and social responsibility,” he says.
Colleen Theron, head of LG’s environmental practice, says CA 2006 will force companies to demonstrate and verify their environmental and social practices.

She says: “The impact is potentially much greater, as businesses will be forced to carry out internal risk assessments and review all their policies and procedures on the environment and social issues to avoid the risk of lawsuits.”

CA 2006 also changes the procedure for bringing derivative actions—which could make it easier for shareholders to sue directors—and introduces new rules on meetings and shareholder resolutions.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Environment , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll