header-logo header-logo

09 June 2011
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Community legal service funding—Legal Services Commission—Provision of civil legal aid

Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors v Legal Services Commission [2011] EWHC 1323 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 10 (Jun)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (Leeds), McCombe J, 25 May 2011

The Legal Service Commission’s system of awarding contracts for the provision of publicly funded legal services in the areas of immigration and asylum law was not unlawful.

Tasaddat Hussain (instructed by Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors) for the claimant. Fiona Scolding (instructed by Legal Services Commission) for the defendant.

The defendant was responsible for awarding contracts for the provision of publicly funded legal services in the areas of immigration and asylum law. The defendant’s allocation of work was achieved by allocating what it called “New Matter Starts” (NMS) proportionality among successful bidders. In November 2009, it began the tender process for the period October 2010 to October 2013. The rules of tender were governed by a document entitled “Information for Applicants” (IFA). Clause 7.16 of the IFA required applicants to be able to commence provision of the relevant services on 1 October 2010 and said that it would seek verification

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll