header-logo header-logo

28 April 2011
Issue: 7463 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Community legal service funding—Costs out of community legal service fund—Jurisdiction

F and others v Legal Services Commission [2011] EWHC 899 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 95 (Apr)

Queen’s Bench Division, Sharp J, 8 Apr 2011

Whether someone will suffer financial hardship if their costs are not reimbursed by the losing party is a question of fact and degree; there is no absolute standard by which that can be judged

Robert Marven (instructed by Legal & Governance Team, Legal Services Commission) for the LSC. Guy Mansfield QC (instructed by Kingsley Napley LLP (KN)) for the interveners.

The underlying proceedings concerned a claim for ancillary relief, in which it was argued by the applicant, P, that the respondent, R, was the true beneficial owner of a number of properties and shares. A number of family members intervened in the proceedings. The same firm of solicitors (KN) acted for all the interveners, but had a separate retainer from each. The applicant was publicly funded throughout the proceedings. R and the interveners were non-funded parties. In September 2006, KN wrote on behalf of each of its clients to the respondent Legal Services

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll