header-logo header-logo

24 July 2013
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Commons registration

Church Commissioners for England v Hampshire County Council [2013] EWHC 1933 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 170 (Jul)

In principle, a corrected application could have retrospective effect. There was nothing in the wording of the Commons (Regulation of Town or Village Greens) (Interim Arrangements) (England) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/457), which required the court to decide that there could not be retrospective effect of a corrected application. Provided that the landowner was notified that an application had been made, there was no unfairness. It had to be borne in mind that many applications for registration as a town or village green were made by interested persons acting without legal assistance and, since the rights sought would be for the benefit of the public, applications ought not to be defeated by technicalities.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll