header-logo header-logo

14 December 2018 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Commoners & kings

​Michael Nash explores how far the customs & conventions of the Royal Family have evolved

Two weddings and two royal biographies* this year seem to have lifted the Royal Family into yet another circle of democratisation, a movement which began in the last third of the nineteenth century. But the question remains: does the public want the Royal Family to be like the rest of us? Surely their whole raison d’etre is to be different, to be other, to be ‘on another planet’?

In modern times the question has not gone beyond marriages to the aristocracy, something begun by Queen Victoria in 1871 and confirmed by George V in his various Letters Patent in 1917. The marriage of Princess Louise to the Marquess of Lorne in 1871 was the first non-royal marriage since Stuart times, if one excludes various mésalliances of the Hanoverian princes. It was popular though, simply because the princess was not marrying yet another German. The princess was given away by her own mother, the queen, her father being dead. Queen Victoria was a woman singularly free of most of the prejudices shared

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll