header-logo header-logo

28 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Contempt , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Committee to investigate sub judice debate

A parliamentary committee is investigating the sub judice resolution, which prevents MPs from referring to a current or impending court case

The House of Commons Procedure Committee will investigate, among other things, whether the current rule strikes the right balance, whether it should more closely align with the Contempt of Court Act 1981 (or vice versa), and whether current sanctions are sufficient.

It will also address the implications of social media on the resolution.

Cat Smith MP, chair of the Procedure Committee, said: ‘The time is right for an in-depth review.’

Submit evidence by 31 July 2025.

Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Contempt , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll