header-logo header-logo

21 October 2026
Issue: 8182 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Committee backs Commons sub judice rules

The sub judice resolution that prevents MPs from referring to active legal proceedings in the House of Commons is fit for purpose, the Procedure Committee has concluded

Speaker Lindsay Hoyle asked the committee to review the resolution after granting a waiver so the House could discuss the Southport attacks prior to sentencing and while the case was sub judice, early last year. The resolution, in place since 2001, grants the chair wide discretionary powers.

Reporting this week, committee chair Cat Smith MP said: ‘The ability for MPs to speak freely on topical matters is of the utmost importance, but we must do so in a way that doesn’t prejudice matters that are before the courts.

‘We found that the sub judice resolution maintains this delicate balance and is effective in its current form and works in practice.’ The committee reaffirmed its support for the speaker to continue to issue waivers on a case-by-case basis.

Issue: 8182 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll