header-logo header-logo

08 December 2021
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Legal News , Equality , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Commission recommends hate crime reforms

LGBT+ and disabled victims would be given the same protection as those targeted because of their race and religion, under a shake-up of hate crime legislation recommended by the Law Commission

In 2020/21, there were 10,679 prosecutions and 9,263 convictions for hate crimes in England and Wales. However, crimes involving racial or religious hostility can be treated as ‘aggravated offences’ and receive higher maximum sentences than the base offence, whereas crimes involving hostility on the basis of the victim’s sexual orientation, trans identity or disability qualify for ‘enhanced sentencing’ which increases the sentence, but only within the existing maximum. The commission proposes that the five characteristics be protected equally.

The proposals, announced this week, would also increase protection for women and girls by extending the offence of stirring up hatred (behaviour that incites others to hate entire groups) to cover sex or gender. This is aimed at tackling ‘incel’ (involuntarily celibate) ideology, following an increase in rape and murder threats against women from incels.

The commission recommends the government consider a new offence of public sexual harassment, which it believes would provide more effective protection than adding sex or gender to hate crime laws.

It also proposes tightening up freedom of expression laws, and would safeguard private conversations regardless of where they take place and ‘neutral reporting’ by

journalists of inflammatory hate speech. It proposes providing explicit protection for certain controversial topics―‘gender critical’ views, criticism of foreign governments and discussion of cultural practices and immigration, asylum and citizenship policy.

While hate speech and ‘stirring up’ offences (for example, racist chanting at football matches) receive a lot of public attention, the Commission highlights that the threshold for prosecution is high, and there are fewer than ten prosecutions in a typical year. There is currently no ‘stirring up’ offence for hate speech on the basis of disability or trans identity.

Law Commissioner, Prof Penney Lewis said: ‘Hate crime has a terrible impact on victims and it’s unacceptable that the current levels of protection are so inconsistent.

‘Our recommendations would improve protections for victims while also ensuring that the right of freedom of expression is safeguarded.’

Issue: 7960 / Categories: Legal News , Equality , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll