header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking , Competition
printer mail-detail

Commission condemns banking competition barriers

News

Major competition barriers in the EU’s retail banking sector have been uncovered by the European Commission which now plans to use its competition enforcement powers and launch separate investigations into particular cases.

The Commission found widespread barriers deterring new players from entering the market, and markets remain fragmented along national lines.
Sam Szlezinger, a partner at Denton Wilde Sapte, says that in some member states, sustained high profitability, high market concentration and entry barriers mean that banks may be able to exploit consumers and small firms.
“The Commission is concerned about card payment systems; credit registers; co-operation between banks; and setting of prices and policies,” he adds.

Areas in which enforcement action is being considered include payment card fees—merchant fees and interchange fees vary widely across the EU, indicating low levels of competition; some aspects of co-operation between banks; and product tying, which may infringe competition law if practised by banks holding a dominant position.

Discriminatory rules in payment cards and payments systems markets will also be targeted as will the use of some credit registers which may be used to exclude new entrants to retail banking markets.
Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollits Solicitors, says the Office of Fair Trading has been keeping tabs on the UK banking and consumer credit sectors for some time. 

“From cross-border enforcement of claims under s 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, to excessive banking charges on consumers’ credit card, current and mortgage accounts, the message has been clear: banks need to do more to protect consumers and justify what some see as exaggerated levels of profit.” 

He adds that while the Commission comments on issues such as disproportionately high banking charges for consumers, it focuses more on the inconsistencies in the markets across the member states. 

“One thing is clear,” he adds. “The banks are not in for an easy ride.”

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll