header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking , Competition
printer mail-detail

Commission condemns banking competition barriers

News

Major competition barriers in the EU’s retail banking sector have been uncovered by the European Commission which now plans to use its competition enforcement powers and launch separate investigations into particular cases.

The Commission found widespread barriers deterring new players from entering the market, and markets remain fragmented along national lines.
Sam Szlezinger, a partner at Denton Wilde Sapte, says that in some member states, sustained high profitability, high market concentration and entry barriers mean that banks may be able to exploit consumers and small firms.
“The Commission is concerned about card payment systems; credit registers; co-operation between banks; and setting of prices and policies,” he adds.

Areas in which enforcement action is being considered include payment card fees—merchant fees and interchange fees vary widely across the EU, indicating low levels of competition; some aspects of co-operation between banks; and product tying, which may infringe competition law if practised by banks holding a dominant position.

Discriminatory rules in payment cards and payments systems markets will also be targeted as will the use of some credit registers which may be used to exclude new entrants to retail banking markets.
Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollits Solicitors, says the Office of Fair Trading has been keeping tabs on the UK banking and consumer credit sectors for some time. 

“From cross-border enforcement of claims under s 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, to excessive banking charges on consumers’ credit card, current and mortgage accounts, the message has been clear: banks need to do more to protect consumers and justify what some see as exaggerated levels of profit.” 

He adds that while the Commission comments on issues such as disproportionately high banking charges for consumers, it focuses more on the inconsistencies in the markets across the member states. 

“One thing is clear,” he adds. “The banks are not in for an easy ride.”

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Banking , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll