header-logo header-logo

04 March 2011 / Louise Smail , Gerard Forlin KC
Issue: 7455 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Come in number 43

Since 1194 when the office of coroner was established, the role and significance of coroners has increased.

Gerard Forlin QC & Louise Smail assess the impact of Rule 43

Since 1194 when the office of coroner was established, the role and significance of coroners has increased. The coroner’s role is an independent judicial officer who investigates sudden, violent, or unnatural death. The verdict must be given in such a way that it doesn’t appear to determine any question of criminal or civil liability. An inquest should not take place until the police have confirmed that there are to be no prosecutions.

However, if in the course of the inquest evidence arises which suggests there ought to be a prosecution, then the coroner is able to refer the matter back to the police and/or director of public prosecutions to reconsider the matter. If there is an unlawful killing verdict, the matter is automatically referred back to the police. In relation to health and safety prosecutions these normally, but not always, are brought after the inquest has been concluded. See R v Beedie

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll