header-logo header-logo

03 July 2009 / Alan Owens
Issue: 7376 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A collective debate

Alan Owens predicts a long wait if the UK is to adopt a class action regime

There has in recent years been much debate about the development of collective action mechanisms both at national and European levels. In the case of Emerald Supplies Ltd v British Airways Plc [2009] EWHC 741 (Ch) the chancellor of the High Court struck out the representative element of a claimant’s claim concerning alleged anti-competitive agreements which have been the subject of prosecutions in the US and on-going investigations by the European Commission. The decision highlights the status of the current collective mechanisms in the UK.

The claim

The claimants imported cut flowers from Columbia and Kenya and used the air freight services of British Airways (BA) and other international airlines. The claimants alleged that BA had been a party to agreements and concerted practices with other international airlines directly or indirectly to fix the prices at which air freight services are supplied or to control or share the market for that supply with the object or effect of such agreements or practices to prevent or distort competition.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll