header-logo header-logo

11 August 2026
Issue: 8174 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Cohabiting couples: What about choice?

Former law lecturer Baroness Ruth Deech has warned the government has no clear mandate for introducing automatic legal rights and obligations for cohabiting couples without their consent

A Survation poll of more than 2,000 adults found 72% had heard little or nothing about the government’s proposals, and only 37% supported them after they were explained.

Responding this week to the Ministry of Justice consultation, A fairer end to relationships, the crossbench peer argued a simple opt-in system for unmarried couples would be fairer.

Under the proposals, rights to pensions, inheritance, property and other assets would automatically apply after three years or the birth of a child unless both partners formally opt out after first obtaining independent legal advice.

Baroness Deech said: ‘I believe those rights should continue to be based on informed consent.’

Issue: 8174 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll