header-logo header-logo

03 March 2023 / Jane Craig
Issue: 8015 / Categories: Opinion , Family
printer mail-detail

Cohabitation: a call to action

113336
As the number of people living together without marrying continues to rise, the time for an ‘opt-out’ cohabitation law regime is now, argues Jane Craig

It took 34 years of tireless campaigning, and a judgment in the Supreme Court, to achieve ‘no fault’ divorce in England and Wales (Owens v Owens [2018] UKSC 41, [2018] All ER (D) 144 (Jul)). When the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 finally came into force on 6 April 2022, to a huge media fanfare, there was a collective sigh of relief among family justice professionals.

The next hurdle to overcome will be to achieve cohabitation law reform, which is similarly long overdue.

The argument on choice

The Family Law Reform Now Network’s Cohabitation Reform Conference in January was inspirational. It brought together academics from different jurisdictions, practitioners, and the Scottish Law Commissioner. They shared their research and insights into what works and what doesn’t in other countries, why we need reform in this country, and how we might achieve it.

One of the arguments often used by opponents of cohabitation law reform

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll