header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

From the coalface

Ian Smith reports on some interesting employment law judgments which have emerged recently from the courts

In the last month, two high-profile cases ended in little progress, even though they were considered at the highest level. First, the Supreme Court considered the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the “pilots’ holiday pay” case (British Airways plc v Williamson [2012] UKSC 43). The argument at the resumed hearing revolved around whether a tribunal could hear the claim at all, given the lack in the Civil Aviation (Working Time) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/756) of any definition of holiday pay, or even a procedure for determining it. It was held that the tribunal would have to do its best and the matter was remitted to it with little guidance as to the meaning of the CJEU’s judgment. We must now await that decision on the facts and any appeals. Second, the CJEU refused to determine the reference sent to it by the Court of Appeal in an important case on collective redundancy consultation (United States of America v Nolan C-583/10)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll