header-logo header-logo

23 November 2012 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

From the coalface

Ian Smith reports on some interesting employment law judgments which have emerged recently from the courts

In the last month, two high-profile cases ended in little progress, even though they were considered at the highest level. First, the Supreme Court considered the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the “pilots’ holiday pay” case (British Airways plc v Williamson [2012] UKSC 43). The argument at the resumed hearing revolved around whether a tribunal could hear the claim at all, given the lack in the Civil Aviation (Working Time) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/756) of any definition of holiday pay, or even a procedure for determining it. It was held that the tribunal would have to do its best and the matter was remitted to it with little guidance as to the meaning of the CJEU’s judgment. We must now await that decision on the facts and any appeals. Second, the CJEU refused to determine the reference sent to it by the Court of Appeal in an important case on collective redundancy consultation (United States of America v Nolan C-583/10)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll