header-logo header-logo

Clock is ticking as Brexit beckons

15 February 2018
Issue: 7781 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Just one year to go until we leave the EU, and we ‘still have yet to agree among ourselves the fundamentals of the relationship,’ David Greene writes in this week’s NLJ.

Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe and NLJ columnist, says the European Commission’s November paper on civil justice was ‘a stark warning’ that civil and family law judgments will no longer be enforceable in the EU. Likewise, the EU Council’s January paper on the transition period presents a ‘stark’ EU position.

Meanwhile, crucial political decisions have yet to be taken, and ‘time is ticking on putting into place any alternatives’ to a transition period. For example, the lead-in to joining the Lugano Convention (as a replacement for the Brussels Regulations) is at least 12 months.

Issue: 7781 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll