header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
02 December 2022 / Laura Davidson
Issue: 8005 / Categories: Features , Court of Protection , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Cloak & dagger in the Court of Protection?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
102822
Closed proceedings & covert medication. In the first of a two-part series, Dr Laura Davidson asks if the Court of Protection has retreated to the realm of secrecy
  • In closed Court of Protection proceedings excluding her mother who was a party, the covert administration of hormone medication was authorised to a young woman.
  • The case raises multiple serious concerns, including around lack of disclosure and the right to family life.

There have been some extraordinary goings-on in the Court of Protection of late. In Re A (Covert Medication: Closed Proceedings), within the case A Council v A (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and others [2022] EWCOP 44, a single judgment was published containing Part One (following a closed hearing on 15 September 2022 to which B was not a party) and Part Two relating to an open hearing involving all parties from 20 to 22 September 2022. A prior judgment of Judge Moir was also published simultaneously (The Local Authority v A & Ors [2019] EWCOP 68). However, the complex history

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll