header-logo header-logo

Clients demand more from law firms

08 November 2007
Issue: 7296 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-detail

News

Law firms are reluctant to help clients control costs and move away from hourly billing, according to in-house counsel research.

The CMS Cameron McKenna report, How much? Over Priced, Over Paid & Over Budget?, shows that in-house counsel want service providers to move away from charging hourly rates and adopt “concept billing” instead. Respondents said that hourly billing offers little reflection of value and provides little incentive to be cost effective.

Richard Price, senior partner at CMS Cameron McKenna, says: “The demand for better response from their legal advisers seems to far outweigh tangible evidence of improvement across the sector.
“Disappointingly, only 40% of interviewees felt that law firms have responded proactively in helping them to reduce costs.”

Respondents were also critical of firms’ project management skills. One in-house lawyer said: “It’s madness that you’re paying £90,000 for a newly qualified. It’s madness that lawyers have to work 2,000 billable hours.
On the bigger stuff they rate you for a job but what I get from them is their cost drivers and need for good people.”

Issue: 7296 / Categories: Legal News , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll