header-logo header-logo

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Features , Risk management , Profession
printer mail-detail

Client phobia

Feeling client phobic? Simon Young has just the remedy

This job would be so much easier if it weren’t for the clients!
Well, possibly, but rather less well remunerated! What’s the matter this time?

They keep changing their minds. They start off by wanting one thing, and then change to ask for something else.
Have you ever thought that that might be your fault, not theirs? Remember that, under rule 2, the first element of the client care requirements is that you must identify what the client’s objectives are in relation to the work to be done. Sometimes, we can have a tendency to see a matter in our terms, not the client’s. We assume, from our day-to-day involvement, that every client in a particular type of work wants the same thing. It may well not be true. How often do you hear people say: “All I really wanted was an apology”, when we’ve been assuming it was the money they were after? Can you always say that you have sat down with the client, right at the outset, and discussed with them what they have really

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll