header-logo header-logo

09 September 2010
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Client funding alternatives

Third party funding on the rise among top 200 firms

Litigation funders have been used by half of the top 200 law firms, according to new research.

In the first of an annual litigation survey by Harbour Litigation Funding Ltd, 90% of firms said they “always” or “sometimes” discuss litigation funding options with their clients.

Harbour’s head of litigation funding, Susan Dunn, says: “We are increasingly seeing interest from claimants who can well afford the costs of litigation but want to share that risk and appreciate having us alongside them through the litigation.”

The survey, conducted over the summer, found three-quarters of claims are for £3m or less, while eight per cent have a value of more than £10m.
One in 10 cases incur legal costs in excess of £500,000— including experts’ fees, counsel and adverse costs, while 72% incur costs lower than £250,000.

Some firms reported that litigation time periods have increased over the last year. A third of firms said it now takes longer for High Court matters, and nearly 90% said the same for arbitrations and three-quarters said the same for tribunal cases.

However, 70% of matters relate to disputes that are less than two years old, and firms say they expect more than 80% of claims to get to trial in the High Court within two years of commencement. More than a quarter of claims are expected to reach trial within one year of commencement.

An arbitration hearing is held within two years in 90% of cases, and before the year is out in 44% of cases. Tribunal hearings are held within two years in 92% of cases, and within one year in 69% of cases.

Commercial contract disputes form the bulk of the litigation workload for the firms (44%) while professional negligence claims account for 12% and insolvency related claims make up nine per cent of litigation work. Fraud claims account for seven per cent, IP claims make up six per cent and breach of trust accounts for four per cent of litigation.

Issue: 7432 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll