header-logo header-logo

03 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Class actions , Collective action , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

Class actions increasingly appealing to public

Public willingness to take part in class actions is rising, according to annual research by communications consultancy Portland

Its report, ‘Reputation and accountability’, published this week, found a strong appetite for action against misconduct among respondents, who see litigation as a driver for better corporate behaviour. However, they want greater transparency of litigation funding arrangements.

Among 2,000 people polled, 65% would be willing to join a class action, a percentage which has increased steadily in the past three years. Only 27% would be motivated by financial incentives.

However, 68% believe class actions mainly make money for lawyers and funders, and 65% would want to know who was funding their claim.

Simon Pugh, partner at Portland, said the findings showed ‘clear public demand for transparency and accountability in both litigation funding and corporate behaviour’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll