header-logo header-logo

03 January 2008 / Simon Young
Issue: 7302 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , Employment
printer mail-detail

A Class Act

Intensive lobbying and government backtracking have transformed the Legal Services Act, says Simon Young

The Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) received Royal Assent on 30 October 2007, and the scene was set for what is arguably going to be the most fundamental change ever in the structure of the provision of legal services.

Previous articles in this journal (see 156 NLJ 7238, pp 1304–06, 7239, pp 1351–52 and 7240, pp 1391–93) set the scene by outlining the main provisions in the Bill at a relatively early stage in its life. Followers of the legislative process will, however, have been fascinated by the number and scope of the late changes made to the Bill, mostly at the behest of the government. The surprising thing about this was that many of those changes were reversals of previous government policy, even though there had been previous defeats of opposition-led amendments. It was an unusual instance of a government which had clearly listened to a sustained period of well-argued lobbying by many—not least the Law Society. The purpose of this article is to draw attention

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll