header-logo header-logo

19 February 2014
Issue: 7595 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Clarity on hyperlink copyright clash

Landmark European ruling in Svensson brings relief for IP lawyers

Intellectual property lawyers have breathed a sigh of relief following a European ruling that sharing hypertext links does not automatically infringe copyright.

In Svensson v Retriever Sverige C-466/12 on the interpretation of Art 3(1) of the Copyright Directive, the European Court of Justice clarified that sharing clickable links with third parties is not an infringement, as long as they do not circumvent paywalls or make the linked information available to a “new” public.

The case, which arose from a copyright dispute in Sweden between a newspaper and a website, concerned whether a hyperlink was “an act of communication to the public”, thereby falling within the copyright holder’s exclusive right and requiring their permission.

The court held that hyperlinks are indeed “an act of communication” but that the communication must be to a “new” public for liability to arise—one that was not the intended audience of the copyright holders at the time of the initial posting.

Tom Ohta, associate, Bristows, says the ruling that linking to “freely accessible” content would not infringe reflects a sensible approach; to have found otherwise could have had a “chilling” effect on the internet.

He adds: “What is significant is the clarification that a hyperlink can fall within the scope of the exclusive right. However, it is not yet clear how this ruling will apply to links to infringing content which are copied and passed on. Two pending judgments on linking and framing are expected later this year, which will hopefully give further clarity on this issue.”

Joshy Thomas, LexisPSL specialist in IP, says: “Content rich businesses where linking is key will be considering whether they now need the protection of more restrictive paywalls.  

“They may also consider whether there are choices to be made about, in certain limited cases, periodically disrupting access to make things more difficult for linkers, or controlling access through protection software. Those who are keen to monetise linking, including the use of embedded links to third party content, will be heartened by the decision.”

Susan Hall, IP specialist at Clarke Willmott, says: “This is a landmark decision and sets a clear protocol for the sharing of hyperlinks once and for all.”

 

Issue: 7595 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll