header-logo header-logo

17 January 2025 / Vanessa Kelly
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Features , Employment , Harassment
printer mail-detail

Clamping down on third-party sexual harassment

203861
Vanessa Kelly outlines the new duty on employers to prevent sexual harassment & how this should impact their dealings with third parties
  • Since October 2024, employers have been under a new legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment of their employees in the course of their employment, including by third parties.
  • Among other steps, employers should review and update third-party commercial contracts to include appropriate contractual obligations and indemnities covering incidents of third-party sexual harassment.

On 26 October 2024, the Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 (‘the Act’) came into force, requiring employers to proactively take reasonable steps to prevent the sexual harassment of employees during the course of their employment.

It is a preventative, anticipatory duty, requiring employers to take positive steps. In particular, employers will need to anticipate when employees could encounter sexual harassment and take reasonable steps to prevent such harassment. Additionally, if sexual harassment has taken place, the preventative duty requires employers to take reasonable steps to stop sexual harassment from happening again.

The new duty does

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll