header-logo header-logo

Claiming for failure

08 January 2016
Issue: 7681 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

How can a judgment creditor extract payment by the judgment debtor of enforcement fees and interest (especially those of an enforcement agent) which arise out of an unsuccessful attempt at execution? Can they, for example, be added to the judgment debt on a subsequent charging order application?

The court is empowered by CPR 44.2 to award costs to the judgment creditor which have been reasonably incurred and are reasonable and proportionate in amount even though they relate to an enforcement attempt which has been unsuccessful. It is surprising, for example, that when a judgment creditor abandons an application for a third party debt order because the third party is not holding any money due to the judgment debtor that the judgment creditor very rarely asks for their abortive fixed costs to be added to the judgment debt. What, however, the judgment creditor is not entitled to do is to unilaterally add abortive enforcement costs—and those incurred through unsuccessful execution can now be quite substantial—to the judgment debt when they come to make their next attempt at enforcement. They must apply to the court for them

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll