header-logo header-logo

Claim form—Service—Partnership

18 November 2010
Issue: 7442 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Brooks v AH Brooks & Co (a firm) and another [2010] EWHC 2720 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 85 (Nov)

Chancery Division, Birmingham District Registry Judge David Cooke sitting as a judge of the High Court, 4 Nov 2010

The High Court has considered service on a partnership under the CPR.
Anthony de Freitas (instructed by Tinsdills) for the claimant. Gregory Pipe (instructed by Taylor & Emmett LLP) for the defendant’s new partners. Mark Halliwell for E. P appeared in person. R did not appear and was not represented. Henry Bankes-Jones (instructed by Taylor Vintners) for S’s executrix.

The proceedings concerned the issue of service on members of a solicitors’ partnership. The action concerned an investment made originally in 1990, since when there had been a number of changes of personnel at the firm. 

Judge David Cooke:

The relevant provisions were CPR PD 7A, pursuant to which it was now normally obligatory, rather than merely permissible, to use the partnership’s business name as that of the defendant.

CPR 6 contained provisions dealing with service of claim forms on a partnership.  Under it personal service was in most

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll