header-logo header-logo

04 July 2013
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Claim form

Hills Contractors and Construction Ltd v Struth and another [2013] EWHC 1693 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 220 (Jun)

The effect of CPR 7.2 (1) and CPR 2.6(1) was that, as a general rule, a claim form was the document issued by the court on which the court seal was placed. Accordingly, when CPR 6.3(1) stated that “a claim form may…be served by any of the following methods”, as a general rule, it was service of a hard copy document as issued and sealed by the court. A photocopy of that document was not sufficient. There were clearly exceptions. When a claim form was served by fax or other means of electronic communication under CPR 6.3(1)(d) in accordance with Practice Direction 6A, necessarily there was not service of the original document issued and sealed by the court. In such circumstances, the hard or soft copy of the fax or the soft copy or print out of the attachment to an e-mail was the document served but in each case the hard or soft copy represented a copy of the claim form issued and sealed by the court.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll