header-logo header-logo

07 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

CJC: portal reforms should wait

RTA portal plans "should be put on hold until 2014"

“Unrealistic” plans to cut recoverable costs for the RTA portal, and extend the scheme, should be put on hold until at least 2014 when the civil justice reforms will have had time to bed down, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has warned.

Meanwhile, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers and the Motor Accident Solicitors Society have jointly applied for a judicial review of the decision to cut recoverable costs. Both organisations fear their members will not be able to afford to run cases through the portal after the reforms take place.

The portal enables claimant and defendant to securely exchange information as the claim is processed through a series of stages. The proposed reforms will reduce solicitors’ recoverable costs from £1,200 to £500 for claims of less than £10,000, include employers’ and public liability cases in the scheme, and add a second band of higher value cases of up to £25,000.

This was due to happen on 1 April, but the justice secretary announced in December that he is re-considering the implementation date. A new date is yet to be set.

The CJC, an independent advisory group headed by the Master of the Rolls, noted that the abolition of referral fees in April will “not automatically” reduce a firm’s marketing spend, and in fact firms may have to spend more due the current competitive climate.

It advised that “the fixed recoverable cost regime must accurately reflect the actual amount of work that is required”, and “should reflect the varying nature of those costs, rather than the lowest possible cost.” It also expressed concern that “it may be regarded as unrealistic to expect all the necessary work and negotiations to be carried out against a fixed fee limited to £500”.

The warning echoes that of Professor Paul Fenn in July, in a report commissioned by the Ministry of Justice, who called for a full review of the portal before it is extended.

Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll