header-logo header-logo

07 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

CJC: portal reforms should wait

RTA portal plans "should be put on hold until 2014"

“Unrealistic” plans to cut recoverable costs for the RTA portal, and extend the scheme, should be put on hold until at least 2014 when the civil justice reforms will have had time to bed down, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has warned.

Meanwhile, the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers and the Motor Accident Solicitors Society have jointly applied for a judicial review of the decision to cut recoverable costs. Both organisations fear their members will not be able to afford to run cases through the portal after the reforms take place.

The portal enables claimant and defendant to securely exchange information as the claim is processed through a series of stages. The proposed reforms will reduce solicitors’ recoverable costs from £1,200 to £500 for claims of less than £10,000, include employers’ and public liability cases in the scheme, and add a second band of higher value cases of up to £25,000.

This was due to happen on 1 April, but the justice secretary announced in December that he is re-considering the implementation date. A new date is yet to be set.

The CJC, an independent advisory group headed by the Master of the Rolls, noted that the abolition of referral fees in April will “not automatically” reduce a firm’s marketing spend, and in fact firms may have to spend more due the current competitive climate.

It advised that “the fixed recoverable cost regime must accurately reflect the actual amount of work that is required”, and “should reflect the varying nature of those costs, rather than the lowest possible cost.” It also expressed concern that “it may be regarded as unrealistic to expect all the necessary work and negotiations to be carried out against a fixed fee limited to £500”.

The warning echoes that of Professor Paul Fenn in July, in a report commissioned by the Ministry of Justice, who called for a full review of the portal before it is extended.

Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll