header-logo header-logo

23 May 2013
Issue: 7561 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

CJC concerned over fee remission

Proposals will “significantly reduce” income thresholds for couples

The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has expressed concern about court fee remission proposals, which would “significantly reduce” income thresholds for couples.

Last month, the government published a consultation on proposals to introduce a two-stage fee remission system across the courts and tribunals. Under this system, claimants’ disposable capital and income would be assessed to see whether they should receive remission on court and tribunal fees.

In its response to the consultation this week, however, the CJC said the disposable capital test would have “an adverse equality impact on older people” who may rely on capital for retirement income. The thresholds for both gross monthly income and disposable capital were too low, and it was “disproportionate” to expect someone to invest half their disposable capital “simply on the fee to bring a claim”.

However, the CJC which is chaired by the Master of the Rolls, supported the introduction of a single fee remission system as it would lead to a “consistent approach” across all jurisdictions.

Issue: 7561 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll