header-logo header-logo

24 January 2014
Issue: 7591 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 24 January 2014

Bring back Slander of Women Act! More on Mitchell & the curse of Sanctiongate

REPUTABLE ACT

In the writer’s crazier dreams, he is libelled by a national newspaper and falsely imprisoned in a supermarket on the same day as consolation for the poor return on fixed rate savings accounts. The dreams of the media have been for freer speech and whilst, post- Leveson , it seems to be taking greater care, editors are blessing rather than cursing the Defamation Act 2013 which was commenced on 1 January 2014 in England and Wales by SI 2013/3027. Here’s our libel free tour of the legislative changes.

Seriously There will be no defamation unless the publication caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the claimant’s reputation. For a body that trades for profit, serious financial loss must have been caused or be likely in order to qualify as serious harm. Trivial claims were already susceptible to strike out but the bar may now have been raised with the introduction of serious harm.

Defence swap Justification, fair comment and the Reynolds defence at common law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll