header-logo header-logo

18 October 2013
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 18 October 2013

  • Workplace blow
  • It's the court fee that counts
  • New PI guidelines
  • Court counters closed for breakfast & tea

CLAIMS INJURED

Industrial relations will deteriorate once canteen parlance moves on to s 69 of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013. It was brought into force against the wishes of the House of Lords and, no doubt, most claimant practitioners on 1 October 2013 under the Act’s third commencement order (SI 2013/2227). So what’s so enterprising about s 69 then? Far from offering organic cream as an alternative to custard with the lunch pudding course, it amends the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 by scrapping the right of action for breach of duty on the strength of failing to comply with a health and safety regulation unless the regulation specifically provides for such right. This will apply whether the regulation imposed strict liability or not. Criminal liability is unaffected. The repeal only catches causes of action which arose on or after the operative date.

The effect of this monumental shift is that the claimant will be required to prove common law negligence in order to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll