header-logo header-logo

09 October 2026 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8180 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way , Landlord&tenant , CPR
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 9 October 2026

CPR: another date; DDJudging: go for it!; Supreme dressing down; Latest blow for landlords; U-turn on rent challenges

COUNTDOWN

Just two more to go and (forgetting the online stuff) the CPR update tally hits 200. Champagne on ice, if you please. The latest update coming in at number 197 will hardly move the earth under the Royal Courts of Justice. It corrects minor drafting errors in number 196 but, more excitingly, clarifies the damages claims pilot that is PD 51ZB. Acolytes will know that the pilot was changed by 195 (see ‘Civil Way’, NLJ, 5 June 2026, p18). Certain non-monetary ‘other remedies’ allied to a damages claim were added to the list of cases that could be dealt with digitally rather than on paper. It was intended that specific performance relief alongside a claim for housing disrepair should be included. But this was not provided for. It now is with an amendment effective 1 October 2026.


LAWBITES

Return to sender There has been a tweak to the CPR PD 51R online civil money claims

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll