header-logo header-logo

07 May 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7885 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way 8 May 2020

COVID-19

Trespassing on 51Z

We stopped pressed last time on the exclusion from the possession claim and possession enforcement stay of trespass cases (see ‘Civil way’, NLJ 24 April 2010, p20). There are trespass cases and trespass cases. Currently, however, there is no stay distinction between the hardcore squatter on the one hand and the licensee on the other hand who is converted into a squatter when they stay put at the expiration of notice terminating their right to occupy. The latter would include, for example, the service occupier whose employment has ceased and the wife of a serviceman whose right to occupy married quarters has come to an end with the dissolution of the marriage.

The PD that has become the 120th update and which amends CPR PD 51Z clarifies that, as we had suggested, the stay does not preclude the issue of a claim which will then stand stayed. The further clarification is that parties to stayed possession proceedings can make applications for case management directions where those directions are agreed. Agreed orders will be considered ‘on paper’.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll