header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 3 June 2011

Super bolts, super supper, super speculation & super duper deposit win

Bolt upright, please

The Family Advocacy Scheme was cursed into force on 9 May 2011, applying to cases in which the funding application was made on or after that date. Advocates will need to know their bolt-on entitlements better than their Red Book if frayed shirt collars are to be avoided.

There’s a 25% bolt-on to the hearing fee where the client (not another party) is facing allegations of significant harm to a child. In public law, the allegations must have been made by the local authority and in both public and private law, still be live. Significant harm is defined. Death is generously included as are burns and scalds and fabricated illness. Representation of a person who has difficulty giving instructions or understanding advice will also rank for a 25% bolt-on in public law children cases but only if (inter alia) verified by a report from a psychologist or psychiatrist (and not based simply on a punch-up with counsel in conference).

A big fat bundle may be perceived

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll