header-logo header-logo

25 November 2010 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 26 November 2020

Double your judge; LANDLORD PROTECTION; WHAT A PRIVILEGE! Open the file; KEEP OUT

Double your judge

The Civil Procedure (Amendment No 3) Rules 2010 (SI 2010/2577) which came into force on 20 October 2010 (the day after they were made so they didn’t hang about) make it clear beyond doubt that judicial reviews can be taken by two judges in the Divisional Court—useful for the more difficult and important cases. The Senior Courts Act 1981, s 19(3) provides that any jurisdiction of the High Court is only to be exercised by a single judge except where rules of court required it to be exercised by the Divisional Court which must consist of at least two judges. Alas, it appears that since 2000 there have been no rules of court explicitly providing for appropriate directions. This accounts for why, once the desirability of clarification came to light, judicial duos on judicial reviews temporarily disappeared.

LANDLORD PROTECTION

The tenancy deposit scheme under the Housing Act 2004 ss 212-215 is drained of all effect by reducing the remedy for non-compliance to near impotence and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll