header-logo header-logo

17 June 2010 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Case law , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 18 June 2010

NOT BOTHERED; FEWER FACTS PART II; IT’S BACK

Whatshisname?

How to address a tribunal judge—otherwise than behind his back—may present a dilemma. Have no fear. The Senior President of Tribunals has just come out with revised guidance. In hearing rooms they should continue to be called “Sir” or “Madam” which is the practice even in the EAT when a High Court or circuit judge is presiding. In the Upper Tribunal when a judge is referred to in, for example, a decision document or after signature, the handle “Upper Tribunal Judge X” should be used. The titles of “chamber president” and “deputy chamber president” should be given in full but may be abbreviated to “CP” and “DCP” in the course of a decision. High Court and circuit judges sitting in the Upper Tribunal are to be referred to by their court titles (if you expect to encounter a Lord Justice of Appeal at a cocktail party or in an ice-cream or bus queue this summer then NLJ 15 February 2008, p 258 is a must).

Joe Soap QC (honoris causa)

A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll