header-logo header-logo

17 June 2010 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7422 / Categories: Case law , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 18 June 2010

NOT BOTHERED; FEWER FACTS PART II; IT’S BACK

Whatshisname?

How to address a tribunal judge—otherwise than behind his back—may present a dilemma. Have no fear. The Senior President of Tribunals has just come out with revised guidance. In hearing rooms they should continue to be called “Sir” or “Madam” which is the practice even in the EAT when a High Court or circuit judge is presiding. In the Upper Tribunal when a judge is referred to in, for example, a decision document or after signature, the handle “Upper Tribunal Judge X” should be used. The titles of “chamber president” and “deputy chamber president” should be given in full but may be abbreviated to “CP” and “DCP” in the course of a decision. High Court and circuit judges sitting in the Upper Tribunal are to be referred to by their court titles (if you expect to encounter a Lord Justice of Appeal at a cocktail party or in an ice-cream or bus queue this summer then NLJ 15 February 2008, p 258 is a must).

Joe Soap QC (honoris causa)

A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll